Log In Create Account
Beta

Flashcards Studio

Write, submit, and receive AI feedback with score breakdowns.

Grades Left 0 this week
AI Graded 0 this week
Tracked Cards 0 saved
Due Review 0 cards
Question Type
0 tracked cards Civil Procedure
Next

Question

Paige, a citizen of State A, sued two defendants in State B state court for injuries from a warehouse accident. She seeks $250,000. LoaderCo is incorporated and headquartered in State C. Manager Ben is a citizen of State B. Paige asserts only state-law negligence claims. LoaderCo was served on May 1. Ben was served on May 5. On May 20, LoaderCo filed a notice of removal to the federal district court for the district embracing the State B court. Ben did not join or consent to the notice.
Paige moves to remand on June 10, arguing that Ben is a forum defendant and did not consent to removal. LoaderCo argues that complete diversity and the amount in controversy are present, and that any procedural defects were harmless.
Should the federal court remand? Discuss.

Your Answer

Use your browser microphone to dictate. This does not use AI credits.
0 words, 0 / 3000 characters
Load another random question